Pricing built for real work.
Most teams don't have a talent problem. They have a clarity + coordination problem - ownership blur, slow decisions, avoided conflict, hybrid ambiguity.
NR4 turns dynamics into operational clarity, then anchors a 90-day plan + scoreboard your team can run.
- Fact-based inputs -> shared reality
- Agreements -> cadence -> scoreboard
- Progress that survives calendar pressure
- Distributed coordination patterns
- Decision velocity + ownership clarity
- Less drift, less rework, fewer loops
- Capability transfer by default
- No dependency games
- We make ourselves less needed
Pick the cleanest next step.
If you're unsure, start with the Diagnostic Sprint. It creates a shared reality fast - then you decide whether to embed the system for 90 days.
- Team Snapshot (signals, friction map, root causes)
- Structured inputs: surveys + targeted interviews
- Debrief that makes hard conversations easier
- Operating Agreements (non-negotiables)
- 90-Day Plan + Scoreboard (owner + cadence + measures)
- Designed for hybrid / distributed teams
- Neutral, safe, direct facilitation (not therapy)
- You keep ownership. We reduce dependency over time.
- Everything in the Sprint (or start from your existing diagnostics)
- Operating cadence: decision rhythms + meeting architecture
- Role clarity + ownership boundaries (reduce rework)
- Conflict hygiene + escalation rules (less avoidance loops)
- Execution Scoreboard: leading indicators + accountability
- Capability transfer (so NR4 becomes less needed over time)
- 3-month minimum engagement window
- Works with SLT, VP/Director layers, and a core team
- Hybrid-first; remote delivery available across Canada
- CQ assessment + team profile (pattern-level insights)
- Debrief: norms, friction points, collaboration risks
- Practical agreements: communication + decision defaults
- Integration into your operating cadence
- Optional leader coaching add-on
- Use as standalone or as part of Sprint/OS Build
- Not DEI theatre - operational clarity for real teams
- Works especially well with hybrid ambiguity
- Decision clarity under ambiguity
- Stakeholder navigation (business <-> tech bridge)
- Leadership operating habits (not personality theatre)
- Optional assessments (EQ-i, 360, strengths) when useful
- Always tied back to outcomes and execution
- Not the primary growth engine - best as an add-on
- Prefer retainer blocks when there is an active operating plan
- We will redirect you to Sprint if the issue is systemic/team-wide
What you get, in plain terms.
We're not selling inspiration. We're building operating clarity that improves decision velocity and execution reliability.
| Output | What it solves | Typical signal |
|---|---|---|
| Team SnapshotFriction map + root causes | Stop guessing. Align on reality. | We are busy but not moving. |
| Non-negotiablesOperating agreements | Remove ambiguity and repeated loops. | Same conflicts keep returning. |
| 90-Day PlanOwners + cadence | Convert intent into execution. | Great meetings, weak follow-through. |
| ScoreboardLeading indicators | Make progress measurable and visible. | We do not know if it is improving. |
| Capability transferLess dependency | Team runs the system without rescue. | Consultants stay always needed. |
Answers without sales theatre.
Short, direct, and aligned with how leaders actually buy.